Jan. 31st, 2010

Score: 0

Jan. 31st, 2010 12:59 am
madamkerrington: (Shadow Katie)
My first roll of film turned out okay, and the first three negatives on my second roll turned out okay. Apparently, after that, the battery in my camera ran out, so even though the light meter said the settings on the camera were correct when taking the pictures after that, they were all WRONG and the negatives didn't come out. Also I kind of botched the developing, but that only really affected one negative, which was underexposed anyhow. Yaaaaaaay.

I scanned the negatives because I was too impatient to wait until Monday to make contact sheets to see what the shit looked like. Turns out I can JUST fit one 36 exposure roll of film cut into strips of five onto my scanner. Of course, just because I can get something that resembles an image out of these horribly underexposed negatives by darkening them and upping the contrast on them to a billion times what it originally was in Photoshop doesn't mean I'll be able to do that with an enlarger. I will now force the hairy scans on you.

Roll 1:



15 More )
madamkerrington: (Angelo)
with me! The drugs don't go where they ought to be! When you start to bleed from your nose and fingers... Never know where you are with me! Headfuck! Headfuck! Lol. No kidding.

So the assignment for these photos was "Pittsburgh: A Beautiful Place" or some bullshit like that. But really it just looks fucking haunted. Good job, shitty camera, scanner, and neighborhood. I've decided I like these horrible scans of varying quality.



Smores )

Profile

madamkerrington: (Default)
Madam Kerrington

October 2010

S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920 212223
24252627282930
31      

Most Popular Tags

About

--

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags